False complaints against spouse amounts to an act of cruelty: Delhi HC
The court’s ruling came in a plea filed by the woman against a family court’s December 2020 order which was passed in a divorce petition filed by the husband.
Filing false complaints against one’s spouse years after separation amounts to an act of cruelty, the Delhi high court has ruled, adding that such actions not only cause humiliation to a person, but can also lower his or her reputation in the community.
“Making false allegations in a complaint filed after years of separation is again nothing but an act of vindictiveness to somehow not only harass the respondent but also cause embarrassment to him in public amounts to cruelty,” said a bench led by justice Suresh Kumar Kait in a December 18 order.
The 19-page order further noted, “Various allegations were made in the complaint under Domestic Violence Act after separation (in mid-2001) which again were held to be acts which would result in humiliation and lower the reputation of the respondent (husband) in the community.”
The court’s ruling came in a plea filed by the woman against a family court’s December 2020 order which was passed in a divorce petition filed by the husband. The family court opined that the woman had not only filed false and fabricated complaints before the crime against women (CAW) cell after their separation, but had also levelled fake allegations that he beat his son, and ruled that her conduct clearly reflected her intention to permanently abandon him.
READ | Capable but unemployed spouse can’t saddle partner with expenses: Delhi HC
The husband, in his divorce petition, had alleged that his wife had a quarrelsome nature, and that she not only refused to live with him but also had an affair with another man, and that she backed out twice when the duo had agreed for divorce by mutual consent.
The man’s petition further stated that though they separated in 2001, eight years later, in 2009, his wife made a complaint before the crime against women (CAW) cell. When the complaint was found to be forged, she filed a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, wherein she made several allegations.
He also asserted that though he suffered heart attack twice during their period of their separation, she came to meet him only once.
The bench, also comprising justice Neena Bansal Krishna, said that indifferent and nonchalant feelings of the wife towards the husband without normal conjugal kindness amounts to cruelty.
“Thus, such conduct of the appellant in driving the respondent to believe every time that their disputes were about to be put to an end and then to repeatedly withdraw from the attempted settlements can cause disquiet, cruelty, and uncertainty in the mind of the respondent. It is evident that when the matters could not be settled amicably, as is expected of any educated couple, she resorted to making false complaints in CAW cell,” the bench said.
The wife, appearing through advocate Koplin K Kandhari, submitted that she was compelled to live out of the matrimonial house due to her husband’s cruel acts and she did not desert him. Kandhari further submitted that the husband had made vague allegations of cruelty against her without specifying any time or date of the incidents, and such incidents could not have been relied upon to grant divorce on the ground of cruelty.
Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.
Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.