close_game
close_game

Street to studio, verse as art commodity

ByHT Editorial
Apr 22, 2025 09:15 PM IST

In the absence of trust and transparency in the engagement, reproduction, renewal or reworking of existing material could be deemed unethical or dishonest

The spat between poet Aamir Aziz and artist Anita Dube over the reproduction of Aziz’s popular poem, Sab Yaad Rakha Jayega, in Dube’s recent exhibition in Delhi, Timanjala Ghar: Three Storey House, raises interesting questions about the ethics and process of art production. Sab Yaad Rakha Jayega, performed by Aziz first on YouTube in January 2020, had become an anthem of sort for the anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protestors. Pink Floyd co-founder Roger Waters recited it at a protest meet against the incarceration of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, further expanding its audience. Dube reproduced the poem in her work, “After Aamir Aziz”, while acknowledging Aziz’s authorship but, in the latter’s words, “without his knowledge, consent, credit, or compensation”, which violate Indian copyright laws. Aziz has hinted that his hurt is more about the form and context in which the poem was reproduced as an art object. In fact, he has said “if someone holds my poem on a placard at a protest, I stand with them”. He goes on to describe Dube’s artwork as “theft” and “erasure”, whereas Dube claims that her intent was to celebrate Aziz’s verse. She has since acknowledged an “ethical lapse” and the artist and gallery have decided not to put the work on sale.

Aziz fears that his political art has been appropriated and commodified in a studio environment, which produces a sanitised aesthetics that is in sharp contrast to the language of protest PREMIUM
Aziz fears that his political art has been appropriated and commodified in a studio environment, which produces a sanitised aesthetics that is in sharp contrast to the language of protest

However, the controversy puts the spotlight on the practice of an artist working with a pre-existing piece of art. Art production is also a conversation with the past: Existing creations (epics, music compositions to photographs) often become ingredients of new works in new contexts. This process could be interpreted as inspiration, collaboration, appropriation, or erasure (as Aziz has said). In the absence of trust and transparency in the engagement, reproduction, renewal or reworking of existing material could be deemed unethical or dishonest. This underlies Aziz’s fears that his political art has been appropriated and commodified in a studio environment, which produces a sanitised aesthetics that is in sharp contrast to the language of protest.

Unlock a world of Benefits with HT! From insightful newsletters to real-time news alerts and a personalized news feed – it's all here, just a click away! -Login Now!
Unlock a world of Benefits with HT! From insightful newsletters to real-time news alerts and a personalized news feed – it's all here, just a click away! -Login Now!

All Access.
One Subscription.

Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines
to 100 year archives.

E-Paper
Full Archives
Full Access to
HT App & Website
Games
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Tuesday, May 06, 2025
Follow Us On