There are many ways in which we use the words, ‘I am sorry’ in our everyday lives. If David Cameron finds the Jallianwala Bagh massacre ‘deeply shameful’, why stop short of a full apology? Seema Goswami writes...
There are many ways in which we use the words, ‘I am sorry’ in our everyday lives. We say ‘I am sorry’ when we hear that a friend has lost a parent, a rather inadequate way to express our sympathy but most commonly used nonetheless. ‘I am sorry’ trips off our tongues when we can’t make it to a cousin’s birthday party, and indicates that we would have loved to come if it had been at all possible. ‘I am sorry’ is the standard response when we break the neighbour’s flower vase or window pane, to express contrition for something that is fairly and squarely our fault, and to indicate that we are ready to make reparation for the loss.
And yet, as the words of the song go, sorry ‘seems to be the hardest word’ when an apology is called for the most. It is when we have hurt someone very deeply that we find it most difficult to summon up words of remorse. It is when our actions have caused irreparable damage that contrition is often the hardest to express. It is when the sin is unforgivable that forgiveness is so hard to ask for. (Just ask Narendra Modi.)
HT Image
Of his own will Nobody asked David Cameron to travel to Amritsar, visit the memorial to the victims, lay a wreath, and write a comment in the visitors book. It was his decision to visit Jallianwala Bagh
Why him? It was hardly politic of Cameron to invoke Winston Churchill, who was so opposed to Indian independence