Trouble viewing this email? View in web browser

Monday, March 31, 2025
By Namita Bhandare

By challenging beauty norms on ‘fair skin’, Kerala’s chief secretary reopens an old conversation on beauty that leads to the question: why should anyone have the right to comment on a woman’s appearance? Read on…

     

The Big Story

“I dig black”: Kerala’s top bureaucrat questions beauty norms

The senior-most bureaucrat in India’s most gender-equal state had something to say to an unnamed commenter, who compared her tenure “as black as her husband’s was white”—a reference to her skin colour. Even if the inane comment was meant as a ‘joke’, Sarada Muraleedharan was not going to take it quietly.

“High time for me not to feel defensive about either the fact that I am a woman or that I am dark,” the Kerala chief secretary wrote in a Facebook post that was initially deleted, but then restored because “there were things there that needed to be discussed.”

Muraleedharan took over as Kerala chief secretary in September 2024 after her predecessor V Venu, a fellow 1990-batch IAS officer (coincidentally, also her husband), retired. 

She is the first woman to hold the top bureaucratic job in a state that does well on most gender indices, notably sex ratio (#1 at 1,084 females for every 1,000 males in 2011). Her own career has been nothing short of impressive: head of Kudumbashree, the state government mission to reduce poverty and empower women, from 2006 to 2012; chief operating officer at the National Rural Livelihoods Mission at the ministry of rural development, and a stint at the ministry of panchayati raj.

And yet, here she was, being judged not by her professional achievements but the colour of her skin. 

Muraleedharan’s long post addresses her own childhood trauma in dealing with the cultural fixation with fairness. Even as a four-year-old, she was made aware of the colour of her skin. She had asked her mother “whether she could put me back in her womb and bring me out again, all white and pretty,” she shared. “I have lived for over 50 years buried under that narrative of not being a colour that was good enough.” 

Finally, it was, she continues, her children, “gloried in their black heritage”, who helped her understand “that black is beautiful… That I dig black.”

Within hours of being posted, Muraleedharan’s post went viral. At the time of writing this on Sunday, it has close to 3,500 likes, 900 comments and an equal number of shares. 

The beauty myth

In 2023, Priyanka Chopra spoke about being made to look ‘fairer’ for the screen and said she regretted being part of ‘damaging’ fairness cream ads early in her career

With its associations with the leisure class, colonial masters and India’s obsession with ‘fair’ skin is neither new nor limited to only this country. 

The proliferation of so-called “fairness creams" in Asia, Africa, and India is proof that the notion of fair is beautiful has not been dislodged. The launch of Fair & Lovely by Hindustan Unilever in 1975 launched a deluge of similar products, including those for men. In 2019, the fairness cream market in India was estimated at Rs 3,000 crore. 

“The market has capitalised on the Indian subconscious idea of equating beauty with fairness,” said Ranjana Kumari, chairperson of Women Power Connect. 

Social media, globalised ideas of beauty, and the entertainment industry ensured that  fairness continues to hold sway. The idea of ideal skin colour is so ingrained that makeup artists even in small towns now routinely paint brides five or six shades lighter, in a grotesque bid to make them ‘beautiful’. 

“There are so many ways to see beauty, but we are all following the western grid of the shape and look of beauty,” says Swati Bhattacharya, global head, Godrej Creative Lab. “The sinister lie that female worth depends upon looks, and a certain kind of looks, has become a universal truth validated by the global culture machine,” Swati wrote in a 2016 piece for the now defunct website, The Ladies Finger. 

Voice of Fashion. Source: Sabyasachi Mukherjee

There has been a push back for sure. For instance, fashion designer Sabyasachi Mukherjee has used dark-skinned and plus-sized models in his campaigns. 

In 2013, Nandita Das launched a Dark is Beautiful campaign to challenge the belief that success and beauty are determined by skin colour. And in 2020, in a nod to changing times, Fair & Lovely cream was renamed Glow & Lovely. In 2023, it was reported that the market for fairness creams declined by 3%.

Not your business 

By questioning prejudiced ideas of beauty norms, Muraleedharan has focused welcome attention on an old problem. Beauty, she reminds us, is not a “single thing”. 

But her post also raises an equally crucial question on how and why women should be judged on the way they look rather than on their achievements. 

Why should the way a woman looks—short, tall, fair, dark, fat, thin—be a matter for people to comment on at all? Who gives people that right? 

A 2023 survey of 10,000 female-identifying women in the UK, Germany, Spain, Mexico, the UAE and Saudi Arabia found that 97% believe they are judged on how they look with 61% receiving negative comments and abuse about their appearance.

In India too, everyone and their brother believe it’s ok to comment on how women in public life appear. This holds true for women politicians as well as female athletes.

If Muraleedharan—and for that matter any professional woman—is to be judged, it must be only on the basis of her professional work. And that is a conversation that can only be welcomed by all. 

In numbers

2.2 million Afghan girls are banned from going to school. If the ban continues, this number will rise to 4 million by 2030. 

Source: Zan Times report on Afghanistan’s secret schools. Read here.

Gender/Justice 

Following national outrage and a letter sent to the Supreme Court by senior advocate Shobha Gupta, the apex court stayed an “insensitive and inhuman” judgment by justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra of the Allahabad high court. Justice Mishra had ruled that the actions of two men who grabbed an 11-year-old girls breasts, broke the string of her pyjama and dragged her under a culvert did not amount to an attempt to rape. Justices BR Gavai and AG Masih have also asked the Allahabad high court chief justice to take “appropriate steps” against justice Mishra.

Elsewhere, the Gujarat high court has decided to extend by a further three months the three-month bail granted to Asaram Bapa by the Supreme Court in January. In 2023, Asaram was found guilty in a 2013 rape case and sentenced to life. His bail extension comes after a division bench in Gujarat delivered a split verdict and a third judge, justice AS Supehia ruled in favour of extending bail.

News you may have missed 

Rhea Chakraborty with her family outside a temple after the CBI closure report.

The CBI has finally called the 2020 death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput a “case of suicide”. Much is being written about ‘closure’ of a tragic death followed by a sordid media circus that led a witch-hunt against his partner at the time, Rhea Chakraborty. Aided by accusations from Rajput’s grief-stricken family, TV anchors carried out a campaign blaming Chakraborty for his death. The actress spent nearly a month in jail. There have been some calls for a public apology—but we know how this story goes. There will be no apology from irresponsible, TRP-seeking anchors who will merely wait for the next story to sensationalise.

The Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology is accountable for the death by suicide of a 20-year-old student from Nepal on February 16, finds the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The NHRC accused the Bhubaneshwar institute of “gross negligence” that “amounts to abetment to suicide on the part of university officials”. The student had submitted a sexual harassment complaint against her 21-year-old classmate, Advik Srivastava to the International Relations office of KIIT which “disposed of the matter in a very casual manner”, leading to a preventable tragedy.

Harmanpreet Kaur: Less than equal. Source: ANI

In 2022, BCCI declared equal match fees for men and women cricketers. Where does that commitment lie? Sharda Ugra does the maths to find that, far from equal, India’s “elite women’s cricketers are treated, in a best case scenario, on par with domestic men’s cricketers. Worst case, the fact that the country’s best women are in fact placed a rung lower than the domestic men.” Read here.

News from elsewhere

World Athletics chief Sebastian Coe. Source: Reuters

World Athletics president Sebastian Coe has, days after his defeat in his bid to become the president of the International Olympic Committee, waded into the controversial territory of gender testing by reinstating a version of chromosome testing that was discontinued in the 1990s. Female track and field athletes will now be required to test once in their careers to maintain “the integrity of competition”. More here.

Italian politician Dario Franceschini has proposed a law that would make it automatic for babies to be assigned their mother’s last name at birth. This, the former culture minister said, would “right a historic wrong”. The Guardian has more here.

Babies stolen at birth without their biological parents’ consent, adopted internationally for profit and often without legally valid documents. A truth and reconciliation commission report on adoption in South Korea, which accounts for the world’s largest “baby exports” blames the government for facilitating an adoption programme rife with fraud and abuse. AP has this heart-breaking story here.

Before I go… If you’re not sure of the difference between asexuality and bisexuality, think you might know what is gaslighting but aren’t really sure, and have zero clue about what is xenofeminism, you might want to look at Feminism in India’s (FII) just-released feminist glossary. Bonus: it’s in Hindi and English. Take a look here.

        

Were you forwarded this email? Did you stumble upon it online? Sign up here.

That’s it for this week. If you have a tip, feedback, criticism, please write to me at: namita.bhandare@gmail.com.
Produced by Shad Hasnain shad.hasnain@partner.htdigital.in.

Get the Hindustan Times app and read premium stories
 Google Play Store  App Store
View in Browser | Privacy Policy | Contact us You received this email because you signed up for HT Newsletters or because it is included in your subscription. Copyright © HT Digital Streams. All Rights Reserved